<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://reformrivers.eu"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>REFORM - D4.4 Results of the socio-economic survey</title>
 <link>https://reformrivers.eu/deliverables/d44-results-socio-economic-survey</link>
 <description>Results of the socio-economic survey
</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach</title>
 <link>https://reformrivers.eu/assessing-societal-benefits-river-restoration-using-ecosystem-services-approach</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot; property=&quot;content:encoded&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt;The success of river restoration is often poorly quantified due to poor design, absence of proper monitoring or incomplete documentation. This study is an attempt to overcome this ex-post using the aggregating nature of the ecosystem services approach. In 8 pairs of restored reaches and their adjacent floodplains of middle-sized European rivers, we quantified as many provisioning, regulating and cultural services as possible that were of final value to humans as annual biogeochemical or –physical fluxes, or densities per year, and summed these to annual economic value normalised per area. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt;Methods&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt;We separated different forms of land cover using the European harmonised land cover classification CORINE, summing per habitat type and service type. Non-market values were obtained from questionnaire surveys among inhabitants and visitors leading to a.o. willingness-to-pay estimates for restoration, water quality improvement and scenic beauty. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt;Results&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt;We found a significant difference in total ecosystem service value between unrestored and restored reaches of 1400 ± 600 € ha&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt; y&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt; (2500 minus 1100, p=0.03, paired t-test and regression). We analysed possible relations with 23 physical and social geographical characteristics of the floodplain and upstream catchment after reducing these to 4 principal components explaining 80% of their variance. Cultural and regulating services correlated with human population density, cattle density and agricultural Nitrogen surplus in the catchment, but not with the fraction of arable land or forest, the slope of the floodplain or mean river discharge, or GDP. We interpret this that landscape appreciation and flood risk alleviation are a simple function of human population density. Our total ecosystem service values are comparable to recent literature values from elsewhere and scale with local annual land rent with a median ratio of 3. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt;Conclusions&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13.0080003738403px; line-height: 1.538em;&quot;&gt;We conclude that our approach allows ex-post evaluation of river restoration success, and posit that restoration of middle sized rivers in Europe, by and large enhances overall societal benefit.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field field-name-field-file field-type-file field-label-hidden view-mode-rss&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;file&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;file-icon&quot; alt=&quot;PDF icon&quot; title=&quot;application/pdf&quot; src=&quot;/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png&quot; /&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://reformrivers.eu/system/files/4.4%20Assessing%20social%20benefits%20of%20river%20restoration.pdf&quot; type=&quot;application/pdf; length=643456&quot;&gt;4.4 Assessing social benefits of river restoration.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;section class=&quot;field field-name-field-wp field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-rss&quot;&gt;&lt;h2 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Work packages:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/taxonomy/term/6&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;WP4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/section&gt;&lt;section class=&quot;field field-name-field-deliverables field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-rss&quot;&gt;&lt;h2 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Deliverables:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/deliverables/d44-results-socio-economic-survey&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;D4.4 Results of the socio-economic survey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/section&gt;&lt;section class=&quot;field field-name-field-document-type field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-rss&quot;&gt;&lt;h2 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Document type:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/document-type/report&quot; typeof=&quot;skos:Concept&quot; property=&quot;rdfs:label skos:prefLabel&quot; datatype=&quot;&quot;&gt;Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/section&gt;&lt;section class=&quot;field field-name-field-file-status field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-rss&quot;&gt;&lt;h2 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;File status:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;li class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;Final&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/section&gt;&lt;section class=&quot;field field-name-field-policy-brief field-type-list-boolean field-label-above view-mode-rss&quot;&gt;&lt;h2 class=&quot;field-label&quot;&gt;Policy Brief:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;field-item even&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/section&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tom.buijse@deltares.nl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">300 at https://reformrivers.eu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
